This post is going to serve great to those seeking grant. It summarizes the tips and the method for applying for student grant or fellowships.
To begin with, at the formative stage, you need to know exactly where all you are going to apply. Or in other words, identify your needs can be said as the first thing to be done. There could be some who would not be able to distinguish between a grant and a fellowship. This clarity is very important so you could become more precise about your needs.
Grant: Grant is the cash amount you get to bear your research expenses
Fellowship: Fellowship is more like a salary that m you get so that you could concentrate on your writing, without worrying of the monetary inflow
The funding that comes from a grant can be used to take care of many different expenses. There could be unexpected and unforeseeable expenses, that may vary according to the nature of research/. Some researchers may need to pay research participants, transcribe interviews or complete fieldwork in different capacities. While, when I talk of fellowships, their main purpose is to subsidize your time that is getting spent in writing work. It is a great support that helps you to focus all your efforts towards writing without other pressures and distractions.
The US has large granting agencies that provide funding for graduate students. Some of the prominent ones are National Endowment for the Humanities, Ford Foundation, and The National Science Foundation etc. Other than these, there are many of other small funding agencies which could be working around specific areas and may match with your field of study. Most of the universities do provide the database of grant providing agencies that could be used as a very constructive resource tool. After having drawn out a list of places that could be used as target, the next plan of actions is to work around the deadlines of the different agencies so that you application is designed and developed much in advance.
Upscaling yourself to the next level, it is the stage to draft your proposal. The fundamental point, I suggest, here is to revolve your argument around the USP’s of your project for which it should be recommended by the reviewers. A well drafted proposal has to have a very powerful beginning that is attention seeking and thought provoking. It could be a question or some very important statistic. Remember; work well begun in half done. In the first minute of reading the proposal, the objective of your research should be clear to the reviewers. Draw evidence from the existing literature and bring out the gaps in the study, highlighting the worthiness of your project and its significant contribution in the field of your study. Explain your methodology very crisply so that it justifies the means for achieving your objective. Emphasise on the timeline you have set for the completion of the project. The final outlook of the proposal should not just be compelling but also have elements of creativity and feasibility. Do remember to take the opinion of the previous scholars who have been successful in availing the grant.
In the end, I suggest that before submission ensure that you get it checked and taken another opinion from an expert before final submission. You could show it to your supervisor, if he is willing to help, peers, friends or seniors. When you have done you r best in drafting a very impressive proposal, do not forget to follow the guidelines given to from the office. Live by them and follow them meticulously. Last but not the least; do get it checked for typographical or grammatical errors.
Remember to congratulate yourself after having submitted the proposal you have worked upon with so much hard work and dedication.
In order to start off with a research work, it is needed to cite the related works done by the previous researchers in different contexts, and following the same theoretical foundation. Unless that part is done, it is always hard for a researcher to place his / her work in the existing body of literature, as well as demonstrate the significant contributions of the study either theoretically or empirically. Therefore, it is always advisable to carry out a thorough review of literature before starting off with the research work.
Of course, the obvious question comes regarding the starting point of a literature review, as there is no hard and fast rule regarding the starting point of it. Researcher should segregate the entire study into several parts like theoretical foundation, context, methodology, and findings, and then should start locating the literature. In doing so, based on the scope of the study, relevant research journals must be located, where the relevant research works can be found out. Once a relevant article is located, then the researcher should go though the works cited by that particular study, and locate those papers or articles. Then works cited by those articles, and so on. This process is more like creating a number of branches starting with a single node. Once those relevant articles are located, they should be arranged either in chronological or thematic manner, so that the flow of works in that particular context can be depicted in a systematic way. Once those works are systematically arranged, their contexts, methodologies, and results are needed to be arranged accordingly, and that is the process, from which a visible research gap comes up. This process is called Meta-analysis. Once the gap is established, it is possible for the researcher to place own work. For more information about components of a quality literature review, kindly browse through the pages of www.phdbox.edu.in.
Quantitative research can be applied to quantifiable facets of a problem; its findings can suggest solutions to what, where and when type questions. It includes methods of inference, experiment and simulation. Inference based methods seeks to establish characteristics and relationships. Experimental research is conducted under controlled settings where researcher can manipulate variables and note down observations. Simulation relates to modelling techniques. Qualitative research is used for non-quantifiable phenomenon and is widely used social science, psychology and market research to understand the reason and context that facilitate the occurrence of such phenomenon, that is, it seeks to answer the how and why type questions. Qualitative method includes interviews, observations, documents, reports, open ended questions, word association tests, sentence completion tests and story completion tests.
Thesis is a very lengthy and important document that needs to be written by students of postgraduate and doctorate levels. There are a number of companies that have the passion for research support. These firms provide PhD consultants who take care of each and every need of their clients. Synopsis is of great importance in thesis and is the most essential part of research work. It is the only part, which the readers, experts and review committee read. Thesis synopsis can be defined as a summary of the research report. Thesis synopsis helps readers to know if they need to read the entire document or not, to get into conclusion. Moreover, it gives a fair idea for people who wish to read the entire document. Hence, students should draft it with 100% perfection and quality.
PhD thesis consultants are always there to help students in drafting thesis synopsis of top quality. At phdbox.edu.in, students are assisted in drafting a perfect thesis synopsis. Students can get help from the thesis consultants who are experts in the field of study. They provide students with a number of tips and tricks that help them in writing an impactful thesis synopsis. This trick segment of thesis can be drafted by taking help of thesis consultants.
A PhD proposal refers to an outline of the planned project that aims at stating a question clearly along with a systematic approach to answer it, emphasizing its originality and importance, and explaining its contribution to the development of the current literature. A research proposal usually tends to differ in length, scope, and structure due to which you need to work as per the guidelines fixed by the institution.
A research proposal is also a source of assessing as well as delegating suitable supervision teams. In case you are fascinated about the work of a specific supervisor or have discussed about your topic with her or him, it is wise to mention this in the PhD proposal. However, it is firmly advised to identify a potential supervisor and discuss about the proposal informally prior to a formal application. Doing so ensures that both are mutually interested in the research as well as in obtaining information about the design and scope of your project. Nevertheless, getting a specific academic supervisor might not be guaranteed.
A good PhD proposal tends to emerge as you progress. It is usual for the authors to hone their original proposal in terms of exhaustive literature reviews and supplementary consideration of approaches and feedback obtained from the supervisors as well as other academic staff members.